Carillion: The Legal Position

17 Jan 2018

Published in: Member News

Stuart Wilson aAlthough the news that Carillion has been wound up by the Court is not unexpected, given the recent coverage in the press, the full impact of its liquidation will come as a surprise to key creditors, stakeholders and employees.

Benn Richards, Partner in the Restructuring & Insolvency team and Stuart Wilson, Partner in the Construction team, at national law firm Clarke Willmott LLP discuss the news and the expected next steps.


The Legal Position
Benn Richards, said: "Carillion (including the PLC and certain subsidiaries) has been wound up by the Court (on petitions presented by Carillion's own directors). The High Court has appointed the Official Receiver to act as liquidator and a group of licensed insolvency practitioners from PWC to act as special managers.

"The collapse of a large scale construction company will have a rippling effect to the market. Irrespective of the valid concerns of former employees and government departments with large scale contracts, one immediate effect will be to smaller suppliers of Carillion, who may well find themselves facing financial pressures with large debts and the loss of a key customer.

"Although it is too early to say, the possibility of the liquidation being converted into administration cannot be ruled out, especially if it transpires that there is a willing purchaser for the business/assets of Carillion.  However, the fact that Carillion has been wound up, as opposed to entering administration, could be evidence that there is no sustainable business to save.  Nevertheless, it is highly likely that the special managers will be seeking to identify and sell any parts of Carillion's business or assets that have any value.

"In the short term, the function and role of the Official Receiver (along side the special managers) will be to realise assets and to ensure there is a continuity of service while the longer term options are considered."

Impact of the Liquidation & Remedies Available
Stuart Wilson, said: "Those that have engaged Carillion will be rushing to review the termination provisions in their contracts to determine how they can achieve the smooth delivery of their projects. Setting aside the contractual issues, procuring a new contractor will be a challenge in what is already a stretched market.

"The impact of the liquidation of Carillion will be wide-reaching, particularly given it has a number of high-profile government contracts, including the HS2 High Speed Rail Line, maintenance contracts for a number of schools and prisons, maintenance services for National Rail and maintaining over 50,000 homes for the Ministry of Defence. The starting point for key suppliers and stakeholders will be to consider the rights they have against Carillion, and to what extent (if any) those rights can be exercised or used to secure an improved position.

"The obvious first step will be to consider whether specific contracts can be terminated, meaning that the contractual counterparty is free to find an alternative provider for the service Carillion was providing.  Although this may help to minimise further losses, it is likely that in significant cost will be expended in obtaining new contracts.

"For more significant contracts, there may be a wide ranging reach of remedies available to the contractual counterparty.  These could include rights allowing the contractual counterparty to step into Carillion's shoes in any relevant sub-contracts in order to direct and control the service. This may not be as straightforward as it seems as the sub-contractor will need to be paid for all services it has previously carried out, even where Carillion has already been paid itself but failed to pass the monies through the supply chain.

"The Official Receiver may also exercise a right to cause Carillion to perform its existing contractual obligations, with this remedy likely to be most relevant for government contracts where the services being supplied are essential. Those contracts may be performed by the Official Receiver using Carillion's funds to pay for those works. The alternative would be that the contractual counter-party funds the Official Receiver to perform the contracts; the funding being provided on a "quistclose"/specific purpose trust basis, where the funds are ring-fenced and are only to be used for the purpose of performing the contract. However, such arrangements will be costly and contrary to the Official Receiver's likely intention that Carillion should not be caused to trade for a prolonged period of time."

Benn Richards, continued: "It is reported that the sums owed by Carillion to its creditors could total billions of pounds and the contractual counterparties, banks, the crown, employees (including their claims they will have for their pension rights and redundancy payments) will need to consider the steps required to limit their losses. It is perhaps the suppliers to Carillion who are likely to find themselves under the most immediate financial pressure, both being owed significant sums from Carillion, as well as losing their major supplier and source of revenue."

Clarke Willmott LLP is a national law firm with seven offices across the country, including Birmingham, Bristol, Cardiff, London, Manchester, Southampton and Taunton. For more information on Clarke Willmott visit www.clarkewillmott.com.

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linked In

Comments

No comments have been submitted yet.

Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment. Please click here to login.